The UTA Center for Metropolitan Density, AIA Dallas Communities By Design, and ULI North Texas District present a
Roundtable: New Live/Work High Density Solutions
Monday, April 2, 2012
Dallas Center for Architecture
- 1.5 CEH
Moderator Michael Buckley
Director, UTA Center for Metropolitan Density
Crescent Real Estate Equities
Sloan Studio Landscape Architects
Good Fulton & Farrell
William Lyle Burgin
University of Texas at Arlington
Dallas Arts District
J. Mark Wolf
UTA’s Center for Metropolitan Development (CfMD) conducted a recent Survey on High Density with co-operation of AIA Dallas, ULI North Texas, TREC and NAIOP. The results showed astounding endorsement of higher densities for living and working –provided certain amenities and retail/cultural offering were included. The recent CfMD Research Journal shows 80% agreed “we need more high density prototypes –and new design-oriented solutions” while a whopping 85% respondents asked for “architectural character that expands quality of life”.
The Roundtable will explore challenges and new product solutions with a variety of professional viewpoints, including Cultural Management. Private equity, Architecture and Urban Design from the invited Panelists listed above who will asked to respond to a set of suggested Topics, including:
• Survey respondents expressed interest in not only Urban Open Space but also new design thinking on Personal Space. What design and new product potentials can be foreseen for new easy to create Private Urban Space?
• Reclamation and redevelopment of In Fill sites which are already close-in to urban cores, and well-served by Infrastructure, are seen as risky endeavors. Any way to reduce the risk to facilitate more dense solutions?
• High Density Residential design hasn’t changed significantly except for opening the granite-topped galley kitchens into the living area. What prototype designs /layouts could be achieved?
• Will residential renters/buyers accept slightly smaller interior spaces for more exterior features?
• Workplace Density has proven to be directly supportive of Innovation and Productivity increases due to the proximity of other influencers in the workplace district. Yet the cost of urban sites deters corporate end users. Any solutions for convincing cities to assist in Land-banking?
• Challenges to keeping young families in high density districts with new school age children are clear option with Charter schools and Magnet schools?
• Retail and Foodservice within walkable secure districts are considered essential for success of viable Live/Work environments --how can these amenities be encouraged in new settings?
• Is there an emerging Architectural process that can drive large scale innovation in building systems/scale/cost?
• There are very potent fiscal advantages created by higher-density residential and office space –especially for generating city tax ratables so important to upgrade educational offerings. How can cities front key investment /development hurdles in advance, with reassurances that tax proceeds will increase?
• The Pension Real Estate Association which is a major funding source for real estate has recently recognized the Premium which accrues to walkable pedestrian-friendly projects—so the question remains will users pay more a to recognize the benefit?
• The Dallas CBD has survived two decades of suburban competition for office space, and residential options, and has almost lost the battle for specialty retail –all challenges to its distinctive high density form. What role will the new concentration of arts facilities, new parks with event programming play in changing perceptions?
This is a large panel deliberately crafted to generate an intense, fast-paced debate featuring a range of viewpoints. Short opening statements by the Panelists, will be followed by directed questions from the Moderator—with the intention of exploring a wide set of new possible design/development direction.